September 13, 2006 CONTACT: Kathryn Serkes 202 333 3855
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: [email protected]
DOCTORS OPPOSE AMA EFFORTS TO HALT MEDICARE PAY CUTS
“It’s NOT about the money”
PHOENIX, AZ -- A national physician association voted today to urge Congress NOT to take any action to stop slashes in physician payment that are scheduled to go into effect next January, despite the all-out effort by the American Medical Association.
The vote by the Directors of the
Association of American Physicians and (AAPS) came today during the first
session of the 63rd annual meeting in
“They claim that doctors will stop seeing Medicare patients if the pay cuts go into effect. But that’s ALREADY the reality, and it has nothing to do with money,” said Kathryn Serkes, Director of Policy & Public Affairs for AAPS.
“The system is imploding. Increasing payments is like adding a third story to a building with a crumbling foundation. More money isn’t going to fix what’s wrong with Medicare,” said Serkes
In the Congressional memo AAPS writes:
“Some other medical groups have been telling you that proposed cuts in physician payments will harm seniors by creating a crisis in access to physicians. But we disagree. There’s already a problem, and it has nothing to do with the new rates.”
In ads and website, the AMA claims that its survey shows that 45% of its members will cut the number of Medicare patients if the pay cuts go into effect. They not only call for a halt to the cuts, but a change in the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) that would provide for pay raises in subsequent years.
In its memo, AAPS refutes the AMA conclusions and tells Congress they don’t want a pay raise, but instead lays out the case for less government interference instead.
“But those numbers are extremely misleading because it’s not all about the money.
“Surveys conducted by AAPS show many physicians ALREADY refuse new Medicare patients. In fact, about 33%. But even more alarming is that 40% already restrict services they’ll perform to current Medicare patients. (See Disheartened Doctors, Patient Problems: AAPS Biannual Survey of Physicians on Medicare and Patients’ Access to Care, Journal of American Physicians & Surgeons, Winter 2003.)
“But here’s what you need to know: the reason they do so is NOT because of money. When asked, it’s the government ‘hassle factor.’ The two leading reasons given were ‘billing and regulatory requirements, and hassles and/or threats from Medicare carriers/government.’ Payment rates were down the list.
“So it’s really about FREEDOM, not the money.
“And what the AMA survey doesn’t show is that those trends have been in play for about a decade. We’ve conducted our survey every two years since 1995 – not just to show a trumped-up “crisis” about current rate schedules. In fact, our survey shows that doctors would rather treat uninsured patients for FREE than to treat Medicare patients.
“So it’s clear that tweaking the reimbursement rates by a few percentage points by taking money away from hospitals or putting more financial pressure on an already collapsing system won’t alleviate the other serious problems that are leading to physician discouragement with Medicare that are directly impacting patients access to care.
“FREEDOM FOR PATIENT AND DOCTORS WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
H.R. 580 Seniors”Health Care Freedom Act of 2005, and
Say “NO” to Government Cookbook Medicine
“We oppose the various bills playing with the Sustainable Growth Rates (SGR), such as HR 3617, HR 2356, HR 1162 and S. 1574. Instead of changing the SGR, we support H.R. 580, the Seniors’ Health Care Freedom Act of 2005” that would allow the use of private contracts under the Medicare program. This is a win for patients, doctors and taxpayers as well.
“Our survey shows that 63% of doctors would be more willing to treat Medicare patients if unrestricted private contracts were allowed. Patients could pay doctors more than Medicare allows if they think the service is worth it. It would be up to the patient.”
“Also, we oppose any mandatory ‘Pay for Performance’ provisions that would tie Medicare payment to physician compliance with government practice guidelines. This would be a radical break from Section 1801 of the Social Security Act that prohibits federal officials from interfering in the practice of medicine.
“In conclusion, it’s not always “about the money” for doctors, and it’s too bad other groups are perpetuating that stereotyped image of “rich, greedy” doctors. What doctors really need is freedom to practice medicine in the best interests of their patients. That will truly serve our seniors and help preserve access to the best care.
“Otherwise, the best and the brightest will continue to leave the program.”
Disheartened Doctors, Patient Problems: AAPS Biannual Survey of Physicians on Medicare and Patients’ Access to Care
Journal of American Physicians & Surgeons
More doctors will bail out of Medicare, while those who remain will continue to refuse new patients and restrict services, leading to severe rationing in the next ten years.
Those are the dire predictions of physicians revealed in a new survey titled “Demoralized Doctors, Disheartened Doctors, Patient Problems: AAPS Biannual Survey of Physicians on Medicare and Patients’ Access to Care” published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (JP&S), winter 2004. (See: www.jpands.org)
While the future looks bleak, the present isn’t much better, according to 344 physicians responding to the respondents, who are involved in patient care at least 20 hours and an average of 23 years in practice.
"This study is concrete documentation of the atmosphere of fear and frustration in which doctors practice today," said Kathryn Serkes, co-author of the survey and policy and public affairs counsel for the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). "Money is not the issue – control is. More doctors would rather treat uninsured patients, possibly for free, than jump through Medicare hoops.”
The results show that increased government involvement in Medicare is actually responsible for increasing physician demoralization and practice changes that are making it tougher for patients to find doctors who are willing to treat them. And the impact is being felt by all patients, not just seniors, and will get worse if an open-ended, costly drug benefit is added.
“Tacking on some cosmetic changes as Congress is now considering in the conference report will only make things worse,” said Serkes. “It’s like the sick patient who was in deep denial. He delayed treatment for so long that he became terminally ill, and then ran out to have expensive plastic surgery - that bankrupted him. But his friends say he was a good-looking corpse.”
The survey supports 6 conclusions:
1. Increasing fear of prosecution or government retaliation has had a negative impact on Medicare patients’ access to physicians, and their ability to receive referrals and certain services such as surgery.
2. Compliance with Medicare regulations is costly, takes significant time away from patient care, and is an increasing cause of reluctance to treat Medicare-eligible patients.
3. Unrestricted private contracting under Medicare would greatly increase willingness to treat Medicare-eligible patients.
4. Increased fear of retaliation and regulatory burden are causing physicians to make changes in practices that adversely affect patient access and quality.
5. The increasing role of government in medicine results in more difficulty for all patients to access care, not just those who are Medicare-eligible.
6. Physicians are becoming increasingly disheartened and negative about the future of the practice of medicine.
The survey examines five areas: Access by established Medicare patients, acceptance of new Medicare patients, costs and changes to practices, opting out and private contracts, and assessment of the future of the practice. Further, the survey looks at trends of the past three surveys.
Some of the findings:
· 33% do not accept new Medicare patients;
· 41% have had difficulty finding a referral physician;
Physicians have made great changes to their practices to comply with Medicare regulations, most involving less time for patient care or additional cost, including spending more time on documentation, restricting services, hiring more compliance and billing staff, or just quitting Medicare.
Of particular note is that physicians prefer uninsured to Medicare patients, turning them away 50% less frequently than Medicare patients (17% and 33% respectively).
“This regulatory roulette is affecting every patient in the country. Doctors have less time to spend with patients, and are retiring earlier than ever,” said Serkes. “Medicare expansion will only bring more of the same.”
Serkes says one respondent’s comment sums it up: “Unless things change soon, the best and the brightest will leave Medicare. It’s simply not worth it.”
AAPS is a dues-supported, non-partisan, professional association of physicians in all specialties, dedicated since 1943 to protecting the sanctity of the patient-physician relationship.
CONTACT: Kathryn Serkes [email protected] (202) 333 3855