Comments on: Government funding breeds conformity, says surgery professor

By: Medicine Assistance

Medicine Assistance — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:23:21 +0000

Great site for assistance.

By: Jane Doe, MD

Jane Doe, MD — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:20:50 +0000

If you can get your hands on a copy of the book “Dirty Medicine” by Martin Walker (download available from Slingshot Publications), you will see that for years, organized medicine/the drug industry has systematically done whatever it can to criminalize those who make medical progress, particularly in the world of prevention, since prevention of disease is not good for profits. Perfect modern example: the Women’s Health Initiative, according to Jacques Rossouw it’s head, was designed for the purpose of convincing women that estrogen does not prevent heart disease, (even thought we have truckloads of evidence that it does.) So if you do something on the cutting edge, watch your back.

By: Dr George Watson

Dr George Watson — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:16:09 +0000

I would like to hear about Dr Herschman’s treatment for Parkinson’s.

By: Dr. Z. Herschman

Dr. Z. Herschman — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:39:15 +0000

Having developed a simple and effective treatment for Parkinson’s, presenting it to “movement Disorder” clinics has resulted in a deafening absence of response. They will not need many of the grants they currently pursue and have every reason to fear the reality of having to do something else. This funding scheme has undermined every decent clinical endeavor.

By: N.S. Lehrman, M.D.

N.S. Lehrman, M.D. — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:23:24 +0000

AIDS and psycho-pharmacology are two other areas in which the suppression of dissent has produced lack of progress. The entire HIV-infectious AIDS coterie, which in 1984 predicted an AIDS vaccine within two years, is still spending money and getting little accomplished - while Peter Duesberg’s insistence that AIDS is not infectious continues to be systematically ignored. And the triumph of psycho-pharmacology within psychiatry is directly responsible for the five-fold increase in in individuals receiving Social Security disability benefits for mental illness.

By: Nelson Borelli, MD

Nelson Borelli, MD — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:00:07 +0000

Prof. Miller’s observation applies perfectly well on the believe of “Mental Illness”, an ever expanding pseudo medical industry, that lacks any scientific validity and ingenieers and controls the socio-political rules of voluntary human behavior.
Worse, the “Mental Illness” paradigm is untouchable not only to the government but to official medicine and psychiatry.