Myth 12. The uninsured cause overcrowding in emergency rooms, and increase costs for the “rest of us” through cost-shifting.

The uninsured are frequently vilified as “free riders” who receive care but shift the cost onto others—when they are not being portrayed as victims who don’t get as much medical care as some think they should.

Thus they deserve punishment by higher taxes if they don’t accept their “individual responsibility” to buy costly insurance—or else public subsidies to buy “coverage” (instead of public payment for care actually received).

The problem is purportedly magnified by overuse of the more costly emergency room by uninsured patients who delayed care they should have gotten sooner from a lower-cost primary physician.

In fact, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) finds that “uncompensated care is less significant than many people assume.” Citing a study by Jack Hadley and others in a Health Affairs web exclusive for Aug 25, 2008, the CBO noted that the $35 billion in uncompensated care provided by hospitals in 2008 constituted less than 2% of total expenditures, and the estimates are much smaller for other providers. The amount potentially associated with cost-shifting from the uninsured is at most 1.7% of private health insurance costs, conclude Hadley et al.

The amount supposedly lost because of uncompensated care is, moreover, likely calculated from grossly inflated “chargemaster” prices.

The uninsured paid $30 billion out of pocket for medical care in 2007. According to a California HealthCare Foundation study, 50% of uninsured residents with incomes at least twice the federal poverty level obtained some medical care in the past year for which they were charged; 80% paid in full, and 10% were paying in installments. About 8% received pro bono care (Wall St J 11/21/08).

A much more serious cause of cost-shifting is underpayment by government programs, Medicare and Medicaid. The “leech therapy” that these programs use to hold down their own costs by sucking about $90 billion from the private sector adds some 11% (or $1,800 for the average family) to the cost of private plans, writes Shikha Dalmia (Forbes 6/17/09).

Additionally, two-thirds of all medical bad debt is caused by insured patients, who decline to pay their copayments and deductibles, leaving thousands of uncollected balances averaging $500 to $1,000 (WSJ Market Watch 9/9/08).

As to the burden on emergency rooms, uninsured patients are underrepresented there (JAMA 2008;300:1914-1924)—after all, they worry about the cost. In Massachusetts, despite the decrease in the number of the uninsured, there has been little change in ER use for routine problems (Kevin Sack, NY Times 5/28/09). One reason might be that expanded insurance coverage leads to expanded demand, and nothing was done to increase available supply.

Hadley et al. estimated the increased demand that would come from insuring all the uninsured: an increase of some $112 billion in medical spending.

The experiment has already been done north of the border. An ER physician in Thunder Bay, Ontario, estimated that nearly half of the residents of his town could not find a family physician and thus flocked to the ER for every medical need, reports Dave Racer.

Additional information:

4 thoughts on “Myth 12. The uninsured cause overcrowding in emergency rooms, and increase costs for the “rest of us” through cost-shifting.

  1. Let me see… If government pays to insure 1000 people too poor to buy their own coverage, and 30 of them go to the ER twice, each, in a year, the insurance companies that manage the coverage will get 1000 government paid premiums more than they would have gotten, otherwise, and the care will be underpaid, so doctors and hospitals will continue to require outside funding, right? In fact, the underpayments might be such as to not even cover the ER’s costs (including the added billing issues), so the ER will lose money, this way, too. The only difference I see is that the insurance companies will raise their profits and create commercial talking points that twist the truth about how they “care” for the poor. Cynical, but it fits the Medicaid scenario.

  2. I am amazed at this, but I should not be, because I have experienced larcenous Medicare and Medicaid failures to pay on the part of the government, via their so-called private administrative agencies, like NHIC.

  3. Well, they certainly consume valuable OR resources as I took care of one that put his hand into a lawnmower and one who got stabbed last night…..

  4. Pingback: Leader promises not to rest until he works miracle. « AAPS News of the Day

Comments are closed.