<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Myth 1: An electronic medical record could save your life in an emergency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/00287/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/00287</link>
	<description>from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. H. Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/00287#comment-3178</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. H. Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/?p=287#comment-3178</guid>
		<description>I find the electronic record useful only if it allows me to type a note.  

  If entry of information into a template is required, the electronic record slows care.

  While I like typing for legibility, I think a more important consideration is loss of privacy.  Records should be encrypted, controlled by the patient, and the patient should decide whether a company or a government should have an electronic key.  Does this suggestion run the risk of havning no information in an emergency?  Yes.  As a patient, such is my choice.  You could refuse to have your information encrypted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the electronic record useful only if it allows me to type a note.  </p>
<p>  If entry of information into a template is required, the electronic record slows care.</p>
<p>  While I like typing for legibility, I think a more important consideration is loss of privacy.  Records should be encrypted, controlled by the patient, and the patient should decide whether a company or a government should have an electronic key.  Does this suggestion run the risk of havning no information in an emergency?  Yes.  As a patient, such is my choice.  You could refuse to have your information encrypted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

